So my mother and father both grew up in RLDS families of long-standing. Hopefully I have established that growing up in an RLDS family is sort of like and sort of not-like growing up in an LDS family. First, the similarities...In the RLDS church of the 1940s and 1950s, one would have very much been taught that they belonged to the "One True Restored Church of Jesus Christ," that was alone custodian of the keys of the Restoration. One would have been taught that Joseph Smith Jr. was a prophet, that he received the Gold Plates on the Hill Cumorah at the direction of the Angel Moroni, that he translated the Plates with the Urim and Thimmim and by the Power of God. One would have been taught that the translation of this book, the Book of Mormon, was scripture, and that the Doctrine & Covenants (up till the time when Smith was killed) was Scripture and prophesy. One would have been taught that the Priesthood had been restored and that the Gathering Place of the Millenium was Zion in Jackson County, Missouri. One would have been taught to obey the Word of Wisdom, and an observant RLDS member (which my parents' families were) would not have consumed alcohol, tobacco, coffee or tea.
That's a lot of smiliarities, no? Now, the differences...
A member of the RLDS in the 1940s and 1950s would have been ministered to by a "Church Appointee," who would have been a Melchezedek Priesthood holder on salary, called and sent forth from the Church Headquarters in Independence, Missouri, to preside over a congregation. He would have been called Pastor. The Bishop of each congregation was the equivalent of today's LDS Ward Clerk. The only temple an RLDS member of that era would have been familiar with was the Kirtland Temple -- in which no "apostate" ordinances were ever practiced -- and the one they were all saving money to have built in Independence. There were missionaries, but these went on humanitarian missions to build wells in Africa and similar endeavors. The Pearl of Great Price, including the Books of Moses and Abraham, were not recognized as scripture. Brigham Young was thought of as an arch-hooligan who betrayed Joseph Smith and left his widow and fatherless children destitute, robbing them of their father's property and church and possibly conspiring to assassinate young Joseph Smith III.
As mentioned earlier, unlike the LDS, the RLDS of the 1960s was experiencing a generational clash of sorts, between the old guard and a cadre of young minds calling for honest introspection and debate about church history. These men and women were sincere (most of them, I think) in wanting intellectual (historical) honesty and equality (in terms of gender and race) to be addressed openly in the church. A lynchpin of RLDS doctrine had been absolute insistence that Joseph Smith Jr. had never practiced or advocated polygamy. Two books were published in this era which challenged this dogma.
Fawn McKay Brodie's No Man Knows My History was the first. Brody was a professor of History at UCLA, a legitimate academic, who had been raised LDS in Utah. Her father, Thomas Evans McKay, served as a bishop, was called as president of the Swiss-Austrian mission, and was also an Assistant to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Her father's brother was David O. McKay, a member of the Quorum and therefore an apostle who later was to serve as the ninth president of the Church. President McKay was a General Authority of the Church for more than 60 years and served as President from 1951 to 1970.
Brodie's book was undoubtedly widely read by the upcoming generation of intellectual RLDS men who were destined to hold the Melchezedek Priesthood and serve as the leadership-in-waiting of the Church. Its scholarship was solid by 1945 standards. On the one hand, the RLDS would have been giddy at an LDS insider publishing unfavorable stories about the Brigham Young-era church. One the other hand, here was irrefutable evidence that Smith and Young were on the same page when it came to revcelations about and practice of polygamy.
The second book which weakened the "testimony" of the rising generation of RLDS leaders was Nauvoo: Kingdom on the Mississippi by Robert Flanmders, published in 1965. Also a legitimate scholar Flanders' work was published by the University of Illinois Press and was a tour-de-fource documentation of the inner workings of the City of Nauvoo, a period of LDS history when the temple ordinances were being revealed, polygamy was in full sway, and when Joseph Smith (and Brigham Young) were up to their eye-balls in very secular business and political dealings. It was just too much information for a generation of believers who had been raised on pap and dummied down history and downright propaganda.
I don't have any sense at all how these books impacted the LDS community. But I do know that they represented deep blows to sincere, intelligent coming-of-age Priesthood holders in the RLDS, who began to feel that they could not take the reigns of an institution that was built on self-deception or anything that could not be professionally documented. If Smith was a polygamist, then was he really a Prophet? Did the gold plates exist? Was the Book of Mormon true? Was their church and its leaders legitmate?
The President of the Church at this time (1958-1978) was Joseph Smith III's son W. Wallace Smith. His focus was on missionary work in Third World countries. As the Church's website states as of this writing:
But as the church began to move into these cultures, there were "growing pains." Leadership had to look closely at history and theology, working to determine what beliefs and practices were only culturally based and which were basic foundations. Those were not easy questions to answer. In trying to better understand and state the basic beliefs of the church, W. Wallace appointed a Committee on Basic Beliefs whose task was to develop some useful theological statements on God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, the gospel, revelation, the church, scripture, and other topics that they found necessary.
W. Wallace Smith handed this bee's nest to his son, the last descendent of Joseph Smith Jr. to be called as President of the RLDS, in 1978. Wallace B. Smith immediately set a path toward greater ecumenism and further away from the Mormon roots by calling on "the church to a revitalization of its worship experiences" in 1981. In 1984 Wallace B. Smith proclaimed that all offices of priesthood could be held by both men and women.
This was a bombshell and split the church apart. Estimates are that as many as 50 percent of Church members left at this time, some joining the LDS and others forming increasingly disparate splinter groups with various Raisons d'etre such as having to be led by a Smith to not allowing women to hold the Priesthood or needing to be located in Jackson County, Missouri or Kirtland, Ohio. What was left was pretty much a smallish Midwestern Universalist church with an accidental historical tie to Joseph Smith Jr. Wallace B. Smith slammed the door shut on the past by naming W. Grant McMurry, a coffee-drinking non-Smith with a degree from the Wesleyan Seminary. McMurry presided over the first ordination of a female Apostle and changed the same of the Church to the Community Christ. He then resigned citing "inappropriate choices" of a personal nature, which have never been explained.
The Church now has perhaps 250,000 members. On its website the church has a lengthy section on "Basic Beliefs" which states:
"The Community of Christ uses the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants—not to replace the witness of the Bible or improve on it, but because they confirm its message that Jesus Christ is the Living Word of God. When responsibly interpreted and faithfully applied, scripture provides divine guidance and inspired insight for our discipleship."
This section refers readers via link to specific section on "Scripture in the Community of Christ," which states a Preamble and Nine Affirmations. The Book of Mormon is mentioned only in Affirmation Nine, whcih reads:
With other Christians, we affirm the Bible as the foundational scripture for the church. In addition, the Community of Christ uses the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants as scripture. We do not use these sacred writings to replace the witness of the Bible or improve upon it, but because they confirm its message that Jesus Christ is the Living Word of God (Preface of the Book of Mormon; Doctrine and Covenants 76: 3g). We have heard Christ speak in all three books of scripture, and bear witness that he is “alive forever and ever” (Revelation 1:18). For our time we shall seek to live and interpret the witness of scripture by the Spirit, with the community, for the sake of mission, in the name of the Prince of Peace.